AI Incident Response for LAC Small Business
Created by Adrian Dunkley | maestrosai.com | ceo@maestrosai.com | Fair Use
AI systems fail. A chatbot gives a wrong price. An agent books the wrong date. A translation insults a customer. A model leaks a name it shouldn’t have. In a small business you don’t have a crisis team, but you do need a plan. This page is that plan. Keep it short, keep it posted where your staff can see it, and rehearse it once a quarter.
The five-step protocol
Every AI incident gets handled the same way.- Contain: Stop the process. Turn off the agent. Pause the automation. If customers are actively affected, route to a human.
- Assess: What happened? Who is affected? Is any personal data exposed? Is any money at risk?
- Notify: The affected customer first, then (if required) your regulator. Use the templates below.
- Fix: Patch the root cause. Not the symptom. Write a one-paragraph post-mortem.
- Record: File the incident in your register. Include date, impact, cause, fix, and owner.
Severity levels
Not every AI mistake is an incident. Use this classification.| Level | Example | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Low (informal) | Typo in an AI-generated caption | Fix and move on. No formal incident log. |
| Medium (internal) | Agent sends a wrong quote to one customer | Apologise to the customer; log internally. |
| High (formal incident) | Agent exposes personal data, sends money to the wrong account, or produces output that harms reputation | Full protocol. Document. Notify if legally required. |
| Critical (regulatory) | Data breach affecting 100+ people, financial loss > local regulatory threshold, or harm to a vulnerable person | Full protocol. Regulator notification within legal window (72 hours under LGPD; similar under Chile 21.719 and Jamaica DPA). Engage a lawyer. |
Customer notification templates
Short, truthful, no hedging. Send in the customer’s preferred language.English
“Hi [name], on [date] our AI-assisted system sent you [describe: wrong quote / wrong date / incorrect information]. The correct information is […]. We have fixed the underlying issue. [If applicable: No personal data was exposed.] We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you have any questions, please reply to this message or call [phone]. A human will handle your case from here.”
Español
“Hola [nombre], el [fecha] nuestro sistema asistido por IA te envió [describir: una cotización incorrecta / una fecha equivocada / información errónea]. La información correcta es […]. Ya corregimos el problema. [Si aplica: ningún dato personal fue expuesto.] Lamentamos la molestia. Si tienes dudas, responde este mensaje o llama al [teléfono]. A partir de ahora te atenderá una persona.”
Português
“Olá [nome], no dia [data] nosso sistema com apoio de IA enviou [descrever: cotação errada / data errada / informação incorreta]. A informação correta é […]. Já corrigimos o problema. [Se aplicável: nenhum dado pessoal foi exposto.] Pedimos desculpas pelo inconveniente. Se tiver dúvidas, responda esta mensagem ou ligue para [telefone]. A partir de agora uma pessoa vai cuidar do seu caso.”
Français
“Bonjour [nom], le [date] notre système assisté par IA vous a envoyé [décrire : devis erroné / mauvaise date / information incorrecte]. L’information correcte est […]. Le problème a été corrigé. [Le cas échéant : aucune donnée personnelle n’a été exposée.] Nous sommes désolés pour la gêne occasionnée. Pour toute question, répondez à ce message ou appelez le [téléphone]. Une personne prendra désormais en charge votre dossier.”
Kreyòl
“Bonjou [non], nan [dat] sistèm nou an ki gen sipò IA te voye ba ou [dekri: move pri / move dat / enfòmasyon ki pa kòrèk]. Bon enfòmasyon an se […]. Nou deja korije pwoblèm nan. [Si sa aplikab: okenn done pèsonèl pa t ekspoze.] Nou dezole pou dezagreman an. Si w gen kesyon, reponn mesaj sa oswa rele [telefòn]. Se yon moun k ap okipe w kounye a.”
Regulator notification by country
Where notification is legally required, here’s who to contact. Timing matters. Most LAC regimes now expect notification within 72 hours of becoming aware of a reportable breach.| Country | Authority | Reporting window | How |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | ANPD | Within a “reasonable” time; LGPD does not fix hours but guidance says 48-72h | gov.br/anpd |
| Mexico | INAI / successor agency | Without undue delay | Through the agency’s portal |
| Argentina | AAIP | 48-72h recommended | argentina.gob.ar/aaip |
| Chile | Agencia de PDP (from Dec 2026) | 72h | Per Ley 21.719 |
| Colombia | SIC | 15 business days | sic.gov.co |
| Peru | ANPDP | 72h under Ley 29733 | gob.pe/anpdp |
| Uruguay | URCDP | 72h | urcdp.gub.uy |
| Ecuador | Superintendencia de PDP | 72h | Via Superintendencia portal |
| Costa Rica | PRODHAB | 5 business days | prodhab.go.cr |
| Panama | ANTAI | Per Ley 81/2019 | Via ANTAI |
| Jamaica | Office of the Information Commissioner | 72h | oic.gov.jm |
| Trinidad & Tobago | Office of the Information Commissioner | Per DPA 2011 | oic.gov.tt |
| Barbados | Data Protection Commissioner | Without undue delay | dataprotection.bb |
| Cayman Islands | Ombudsman | 5 days | ombudsman.ky |
| Bermuda | Privacy Commissioner | Per PIPA | privacy.bm |
| Dominican Republic | Comisionado de Protección de Datos | Per Ley 172-13 | Via Comisionado |
| Puerto Rico | US federal + local regulators | Per US federal rules and local law | |
| French overseas (MQ, GP) | CNIL | 72h under GDPR | cnil.fr |
The incident register (template)
Keep a simple spreadsheet. These columns are enough.| Column | Example |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-03-14 |
| Incident ID | INC-2026-007 |
| System | WhatsApp booking agent |
| Severity | High |
| Affected people | 1 customer |
| Data exposed? | No |
| Money at risk? | No |
| Root cause | Currency conversion hardcoded USD rate, COP rate moved 3% |
| Fix | Pulled FX from OpenExchange API; added daily check |
| Notified customer? | Yes, 2026-03-14 18:20 |
| Notified regulator? | No (not required) |
| Owner | Maria Torres |
| Closed | 2026-03-17 |
Root-cause patterns to watch for
Over time, most LAC SMB AI incidents fall into one of these buckets. If yours do too, target the bucket, not the one-off.| Pattern | Typical fix |
|---|---|
| Currency or tax hardcoded | Pull live rates; add a daily sanity check |
| Language detection wrong | Detect from first message, lock for session |
| Out-of-date price or inventory | Tool call against live source, not cached text |
| Wrong date format (DD/MM vs MM/DD) | Normalize to ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD) internally |
| Over-promising SLAs | Add a “don’t commit without human” guardrail |
| Leaking personal data in logs | Mask PII at the log sink |
| Agent loops | Max-steps cap + timeout |
| Wrong branch of business | Add explicit branch in system prompt or tool list |
Escalation tree
Post this near the person who operates the AI.Related reading
- governance/README.md: the legal map this protocol lives in.
- responsible-ai.md: the preventive side.
- agents/design.md: how to design agents that fail gracefully.
- risks/README.md: broader risk landscape.
Created by Adrian Dunkley | MaestrosAI | maestrosai.com | ceo@maestrosai.com Fair Use, Educational Resource | April 2026 Disclaimer: Informational only. Confirm specific notification windows and authorities with local counsel. SEO: AI incident response LAC | respuesta a incidentes IA | LGPD breach 72h | AI breach notification Caribbean | data breach Jamaica DPA | plano de resposta IA
